This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:35:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> @samp{--interpreter=mi} (or @samp{--interpreter=mi2}) causes > @value{GDBN} to use the @dfn{@sc{gdb/mi} interface} (@pxref{GDB/MI, , > The @sc{gdb/mi} Interface}) included since @var{GDBN} version 6.0. The > previous @sc{gdb/mi} interface, included in @value{GDBN} version 5.3 and > selected with @samp{--interpreter=mi1}, is deprecated. Earlier > @sc{gdb/mi} interfaces are no longer supported.
This is basically what I need to know. I've asked several times and would very much appreciate an answer from the people that are capable of giving it. (The answer could be a simple yes or no)
* Will GDB support at least one stable MI protocol for an official release? (This answer is obviously "yes", and does not have to be answered) * Will GDB support more than one stable MI protocols for an official release?
* Will GDB support one stable MI protocol for a CVS snapshot?
* Will GDB support more than one stable MI protocols for a CVS snapshot?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |