Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:37:45 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
A system that is being continuously re-factored is not well suited for
detailed internals documentation - the effort is wasted.
Can we say that the features that are not going to change any time
soon are sufficiently documented? For example, the CLI is not going
to be refactored any time soon (AFAIK), and yet its documentation
includes only 3 functions out of at least 10 it exports. The
completion features (I mean their GDB-specific aspects, not the
general Readline mechanism) are not documented at all.