This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB 6.2.1?

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr at ata dot cs dot hun dot edu dot tr>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 14:31:30 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB 6.2.1?
References: <41128FD4.5020702@gnu.org> <20040805204835.GI1192@gnat.com> <41139F3F.7040508@gnu.org> <20040806161616.GO1192@gnat.com> <41151A34.1000704@gnu.org>

I'll commit the ``absolute source path'' patch then 6.2.1 is good to go (well depending on how Eli and Mark resolve the i386 change).

I'm going to back out of my decision here :-(

I've looked over the patch and am really reluctant to back-port it without a testcase illustrating what it fixed. While yes a bug, its not like the absolute shocker MIPS crash in 6.2. It's also long standing. I think for this we should instead accelerate 6.3 a little and pull it into the Oct/Nov timeframe.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Baurjan Ismagulov

References:
- GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: GDB 6.2.1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]