This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- Cc: cagney at gnu dot org,mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 14 Dec 2003 08:34:22 +0200
- Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
- References: <20031214062335.964804B412@berman.michael-chastain.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 01:23:35 -0500 (EST)
> From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
>
> I mean to say: if there have been no test results submitted for a
> platform for gdb 5.2.1, gdb 5.3, or gdb 6.0, then I want to *start* the
> deprecation process for that platform.
There's something I'm probably missing here: who is responsible for
``submitting test results'' for a platform?
To make this more concrete, I don't think I (or anyone else) have ever
sent test results for the DJGPP (a.k.a. go32) target, for which I
alone am responsible. Does that mean you will promote starting to
deprecate it VSN?
> I wanna do about 10 times as much QA as we are doing.
Thanks for all the hard work you are doing already.