This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names


On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:23:16PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:
> 
> > So, the new demangler is printing different, much smaller output.
> 
> That's odd.  I could understand it if gdb were passing DMGL_VERBOSE to
> cplus_demangle().  But as far as I know it is not doing so in any
> version.  Could you extract a few of the larger demangled names from
> each version, and post them?  It might be a good double-check that
> something isn't weirdly broken.  It would be nice to have the mangled
> symbol name too, but not critical.
> 
> Thanks.

My guess is that this has something to do with DMGL_PARAMS.  But again
that's odd since we ought to be passing that when we demangle msyms.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]