This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler
cagney wrote:
> [...]
> > Could someone fix the old demangler, or write a new one in
> > plain C (or re-write the C++ one in C)? Pretty please?
>
> Yes. There's no reason for the underlying demangler algorithm to be
> implemented in vanila ISO C 90, and then wrap it for the C++ side.
> [...]
You might be accused of dogmatic monolingualism if you don't accept
the notion that some such code may be more naturally expressed in a
higher level language -- that could be one such reason. Another
reason of course is the fact that it is already done and working:
rewriting costs new effort.
(Note that I'm not asserting that the former reason applies strongly
here; libstdc++-v3/include/bits/demangle.h for example doesn't seem to
rely much on the C++ language's extra capabilities.)
- FChE