This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: Breakpoint on class member function
- From: Mathews_Alex at emc dot com
- To: drow at mvista dot com, Mathews_Alex at emc dot com
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:36:49 -0400
- Subject: RE: Breakpoint on class member function
I have tried with a gdb 5.3 without my changes and see the same problem.
When I do the configure I use target==i686-pc-linux if that's of any
significance. I'm working with a proprietary OS, so I don't have a binary
to distribute.
Doing "b foo::foo1; delete 1; b foo::foo1" without the target remote does
work.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Mathews_Alex@emc.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Breakpoint on class member function
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:50:29AM -0400, Mathews_Alex@emc.com wrote:
>
> I'm working with an internally modified gdb 5.3. I'm trying to figure out
> if something happens with symbols after a target remote is issued. The
> binary is ELF format with debugging information built with gcc 3.2. The
> scenario that I'm seeing is the following:
>
> (gdb) file symbols.gdb
> (gdb) b foo::foo1
> Breakpoint 1 @ ...
> (gdb) delete 1
> (gdb) target remote /dev/ttyS1
> (gdb) b foo::foo1
> the class foo does not have any method named foo1
> Hint: try 'foo::foo1<TAB> or 'foo::foo1<ESC-?>
> (gdb) b 'foo::foo1(char *, char *)'
> Breakpoint 2 @ ...
>
> So, before I do a target remote, I'm able to set a breakpoint without the
> fully typed member function. Then afterwards, it won't work unless it's
> fully typed, so I'm forced to use the hint provided. I haven't modified
> anything in the symbol area, but I have made modifications to target
remote
> related code.
>
> Any insight would be appreciated. I did see bug 1023, but I wasn't sure
if
> that applied in my case.
This doesn't make any sense to me. Do you have any distributable
binaries which reproduce the problem - and can you reproduce it without
your local changes?
Does "b foo::foo1; delete 1; b foo::foo1" work without the target
remote?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer