Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June?

[Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:39:20AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> >Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking?
>> >
>> >
>> >We currently have the following results from make check on
>> >x86_64-linux-gnu:
>> >
>> >                === gdb Summary ===
>> >
>> ># of expected passes            8930
>> ># of unexpected failures        100
>> ># of unexpected successes       4
>> ># of expected failures          46
>> ># of known failures             23
>> ># of unresolved testcases       3
>> ># of untested testcases         6
>> ># of unsupported tests          1
>> >/usr/src/aj/build/gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version  2003-06-16-cvs 
>> >-nx
>> >
>> >
>> >How does this look in comparison with other platforms?
>> 
>> Pretty much on par.  break main, run, next definitly works.
>
> i386-linux is down at around ten failures.  Alpha's a bit higher,

Ten failures sounds fine!

> sparc's really rotten (thousands).

I hope that even if we branch on the 21st, we have the possibility to
get fixes for those failures on x86_64 into the branch?  Unfortunatly
Michal is on vacation until the 28th and cannot do anything himself -
and I'm also occupied :-(

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature