This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process
On Feb 19, 9:33am, David Carlton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:54:50 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com> said:
> One thing GCC(4) and GDB are now is encouraging exprementation on
> branches development to always occure on branches cut from the the
> relevant repository.
Would Red Hat be happy hosting significant branches for other
FYI, it isn't a Red Hat decision.
I assume you're referring to the sources.redhat.com repository, right?
I think the answer is "yes", so long as the branch in question is
intended to (eventually) further mainline gdb development. If the
branch is just some custom bit of work that is likely to never make
it to the mainline, probably not.
And that decision is up to this group.
Would those other companies be happy depending on Red
Hat's CVS servers?
Should money making corporate types be willing to bet the crown jewls on
those same resources (sware, subversion, sourceforge)? Interesting
Red Hat makes sourceware available as a public service. It funds it
rather than owns it. The machine is adminstered by a group of overseers
(chrisf and jasonm are two).