This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:08:34 -0600
- Subject: Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015
> I'm curious: what shows up in gdb.log when you get FAIL here?
$12 = 202^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp: print pEe->D::vg()
This happens with gcc 2.95.3, both dwarf-2 and stabs+.
It's a different bug than the bug you PR'd. With gcc v3,
I get "Attempt to take address of value not located in memory."
With gcc v2, I get the wrong answer (the right answer is 102).
It looks like gdb is ignoring the 'D::' qualifier and calling
E::vg instead of D::vg.
> Certainly you should feel free to add more KFAIL branches to that test
> if you wish; just send them all to the same PR.
In this case I think it should be a different KFAIL arm
pointing to a different PR.
I will do this tonight unless you beat me to it.