This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Reference to .debug_loc
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:35:21PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:51:24PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
It's supposed to be the offset from the beginning of the debug_loc
Or is there another way?
At a guess it should be like DW_AT_ranges:
.long .Ldebug_ranges0+0x0 # DW_AT_ranges
I.E. dw2_asm_output_offset, rather than dw2_asm_output_delta, in GCC.
Will this do that?
I think so. The result will be something like .Ldebug_ranges0 +
(.LLST0-.Ldebug_loc0). If the assembler won't take that then we'll
have to track addresses for loclists the same as we do for rangelists.
Why simple .long .LLST0 is not sufficient (@secrel(.LLST0) on IA-64)?
It is not the only place where gcc relies on VMA of debugging sections
to be 0 if the architecture lacks section relative relocations.
I suppose that would work. Do you know why DW_AT_ranges is done the
way it is?
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * email@example.com
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz