This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [symbols] Do we need language_specific?



On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 03:33 PM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote:

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>Right now, C++ and Java use cplus_specific, which contains only the
>demangled name. Objc uses objc_specific, which contains only the demangled
>name. And one of the members is always present anyway since the union is
>directly in general_symbol_info.

I remember noticing this also when I submitted the ObjC patch. But I though I'd just go along with the crowd and do the same thing for ObjC, even though I could have used cplus_specific. So AFAIK you can get rid of it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]