This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: `chain-frame'

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:40:06 -0500
Subject: Re: `chain-frame'
References: <3E1CD9F5.4090607@redhat.com> <20030109023850.GA9277@nevyn.them.org> <3E1CE724.2090401@redhat.com> <20030109031217.GA10222@nevyn.them.org> <3E1EEAFD.7060508@redhat.com> <20030110155245.GA6652@nevyn.them.org> <3E1EF22D.5060508@redhat.com> <20030110162132.GA8514@nevyn.them.org>

Maybe legacy-chain or generic-chain?   Hmm, I kind of like
generic-chain.  Then the architecture can provide arch-chain.

I think generic frame is to close to generic dummy frames (and the're not generic :-) I was going to say ya, to legacy frames, but I think we're going to end up with multiple legacy frames, however, ...

Andrew

References:
- `chain-frame'
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: `chain-frame'
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]