This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:52:21AM +0100, Jan Van Belle wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> >
> > 05, SIGTRAP. You should really look at existing stubs. You probably
> > want to be using T anyway.
>
> I've been struggling with this too. Anyway, I only use the S
> command. I think it's
> the simplest way to do something when first implementing an
> interface. T implies you
> support threads, thus supporting most of the
> 'thread-related' commands.
No, it doesn't; it only provides a way to reply with registers
efficiently at the stop. GDB won't assume threads support.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
- References:
- ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
- Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
- Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
- Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
- Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?
- Re: ARM, registers, "frame 0", where's the PC?