This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: New binutils directory src/include/cpu/ for .cpu and .opc files?
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>, <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 05:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: New binutils directory src/include/cpu/ for .cpu and .opc files?
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to propose a new directory:
> >>
> >> src/include/cpu/
> >>
> >> The directory would contain the CGEN .cpu and .opc input files used to
> >> generate CGEN based binutils disassemblers, assemblers and (?)
> >> relocations. GDB could also use these files when generating CGEN based
> >> simulators.
> >>
> >> The directory would be part of the FSF's BINUTILS package and, hence,
> >> would be covered by the BINUTILS copyright assignment.
>
> > Being part of binutils requires copyright for all parts to
> > belong to the FSF.
>
> ``The [new, initially empty] directory would be part of the FSF's
> BINUTILS package and, hence, would be covered by the BINUTILS copyright
> assignment.''
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't see the "initially
empty" part at all implied by "new". Frankly I think it's the
wrong solution to any copyright problem to introduce *another*
directory for these files. Also, it seems odd to put it solely
under the binutils domain. What about CGEN ports only intended
for simulators?
brgds, H-P