This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions
- From: Quality Quorum <qqi at theworld dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>, <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:49:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0400, Quality Quorum wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > > Lets get rid of the easy one (...) `Hg':
> > >
> > > ``
> > >
> > > @item @code{Hg}@var{id} --- set general thread
> > > @cindex @code{Hc} packet
> > >
> > > Select the general thread. Register and memory read and write
> > > operations apply to the most recently selected general thread.
> >
> >
> > ????? Memory is shared between threads, isn't it so ????
> >
> > IMHO, a multi-process debugging is a very different animal from a
> > multi-thread debugging and lumping them together only creates more
> > problems.
>
> Registers aren't, though.
??? It seems to me that I was not talking about registers ???
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
Thanks,
Aleksey