Namespaces; Was: getting rid of the target stack

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>]

> > (and, hey, whatever happened to the namespace work we were discussing
> > earlier?)
>
> It's on my schedule somewhere after thread-local storage and Dwarf 2
> duplicate removal.  I don't remember the dates too well, but I think
> that means I'll be able to start pitching in in Sept/Oct.
Hmm, of all the new features GDB needs, the ability to handle namespace 
support, would have to be top of the list.  The bug database is littered 
with PRs related to this.

So things are really clear, I take it that while people have floated 
some interesting ideas, no one is working on this.  Remember, we need to 
be very careful to not give the impression that this task is under 
control (it isn't) and someone is already doing the work (the oposite is 
the truth - we need someone to step forward and do their ``worst'' :-).

enjoy,
Andrew