This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:01:02AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:53:46AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>
>> None that I know of. cvs logging bites. We do track the # of
>> bytes being sent/received from different hosts and the frequency
>> with which hosts connect. The host that downloaded the most number
>> of bytes last week by anoncvs? A purdue.edu site. Two redhat.com
>> and one suse.de sites make the top six; an IP# and a cable modem
>> (rogers.com) finish out the top six. Not very useful without some
>> idea what repository or what sorts of operations we're talking
>> about.
>
>Ahem, this is how it looks when sorted by connections, but it's
>rather different when sorted by bytes downloaded. For last week,
>it looks more like this:
>
>698 358 959 cwi.nl
>523 131 718 cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
>316 859 474 dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
>302 256 065 sympatico.ca
>220 184 438 austin.ibm.com
>208 933 189 redhat.com
>175 256 836 mypointsinc.com
>144 845 712 dip.t-dialin.net
>
>The first field is bytes transferred over the week; the second is
>the domains for these sites.
>
>It's easy to think these sites are doing something Evil, but chances
>are they're just doing some automated cvs updates on multiple
>repositories once or twice a day, or they had a single big checkout
>of gcc/src and a periodic cvs update or what have you. Don't read
>too much into it without looking closer - I'm just providing an
>example of what we do track and what we can report.
Btw, just as a data point, I did make a change wrt anoncvs access
last week sometime. I upped the load average block so that anoncvs
would still keep working under high loads. There is still a maximum
of 10 anoncvs processes possible, though. I can lower that but then
the anoncvs people will be complaining.
FWIW, I don't know what's special about me but I'm not seeing a problem
with cvs update. Maybe I'm just hitting it at the right time.
cgf