This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: problem w/ igen, multiple -M models, and -G gen-multi-sim.
> At Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:46:08 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Turns out that such instructions need to be given unique field-names as
>> they would otherwise generate functions with the same name.
>
>
> Right. In the example, yes, they had unique field names, but until
> your patch that had no effect.
The unique names get used when generating separate independant
simulators. Without it you can end up with name clashes.
> (still don't need/want to use the feature, but better to have it
> fixed than not. 8-)
:-)
>> See attached. It works for your example.
>
>
> Are you planning to check it in after a delay or some futher testing
> on your end? or you want me/others to throw it into our source trees
> and it a spin to mmake sure it doesn't break anything?
It is in. It certainly doesn't break the N builds.
Andrew