This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: problem w/ igen, multiple -M models, and -G gen-multi-sim.


> At Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:46:08 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Turns out that such instructions need to be given unique field-names as 
>> they would otherwise generate functions with the same name.
> 
> 
> Right.  In the example, yes, they had unique field names, but until
> your patch that had no effect.

The unique names get used when generating separate independant 
simulators.  Without it you can end up with name clashes.

> (still don't need/want to use the feature, but better to have it
> fixed than not.  8-)

:-)

>> See attached.  It works for your example.
> 
> 
> Are you planning to check it in after a delay or some futher testing
> on your end?  or you want me/others to throw it into our source trees
> and it a spin to mmake sure it doesn't break anything?

It is in.  It certainly doesn't break the N builds.

Andrew




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]