This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: The canadian cross build is broken
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: GDB <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:14:41 -0800
- Subject: Re: The canadian cross build is broken
- References: <20020322225214.A23883@lucon.org> <3C9C9F3A.6030609@cygnus.com>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 10:28:58AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > The current tree is broken when configured with
> >
> > # ../configure --host=cpu1-linux --build=i386-linux --target=cpu1-linux
> >
> > See
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00120.html
> >
> > I have been using
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00169.html
> >
> > I guess no one cares about it.
>
> I note you CC:'d GCC but To:'d GDB. Remember, GCC is the supplier here.
> Both GDB and BINUTILS are users.
>
> The most useful thing to do would be to explain to the above person that
> their patch should be submitted to gcc-patches@.
>
I did. You can follow
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00120.html
to see it. DJ believed my patch was wrong, but didn't provide a working
solution. So far, only 2 people complained. We need more people to tell
DJ to get it fixed. Maybe I should give up since my gcc, gdb and
binutils don't have this problem.
H.J.