This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: problem w/ igen, multiple -M models, and -G gen-multi-sim.
- From: cgd at broadcom dot com
- To: "Andrew Cagney" <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 14 Mar 2002 21:20:38 -0800
- Subject: Re: problem w/ igen, multiple -M models, and -G gen-multi-sim.
- References: <yov5zo1dsec2.fsf@broadcom.com> <3C916070.50007@cygnus.com>
At Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:46:08 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Turns out that such instructions need to be given unique field-names as
> they would otherwise generate functions with the same name.
Right. In the example, yes, they had unique field names, but until
your patch that had no effect.
(still don't need/want to use the feature, but better to have it
fixed than not. 8-)
> See attached. It works for your example.
Are you planning to check it in after a delay or some futher testing
on your end? or you want me/others to throw it into our source trees
and it a spin to mmake sure it doesn't break anything?
thanks,
chris