This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 5.1.1 scheduled 00:00 24 Jan 2002 GMT
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: jason-swarelist at molenda dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:27:37 +0200
- Subject: Re: GDB 5.1.1 scheduled 00:00 24 Jan 2002 GMT
- References: <3C473CF1.90201@cygnus.com> <20020117131815.A27451@molenda.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:18:15 -0800
> From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
>
> By encoding the date in the branch tag, which
> people have to use often, you make them remember arbitrary information
> which doesn't disambiguate anything. I can check out a copy of
> the gcc 3.0 branch without looking at a single web page, without
> checking a single tag list -- any reasonable person can guess what
> it will look like. No reasonable person can guess what the gdb
> 5.1 branch name might be.
You mean, you don't have a small shell script for CVS command on the
branch (created when Andrew first announces the tag)? ;-)