This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?

To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
Subject: Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:10:36 -0700
Cc: GDB <gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20010917124710.A21992@lucon.org> <20010917161350.A25349@lucon.org> <20010917191357.A28300@lucon.org> <20010918135555.A12648@lucon.org> <s3ik7yvqobd.fsf@soliton.wins.uva.nl>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:53:42PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> > BTW, people may be very disappointed at the current Linuxthreads
> > support in gdb 5.1.
> 
> If they are they should help improving it.  Several people have
> reported problems.  Most of these I have been unable to reproduce.
> Hardly anyone even bothers to answer me if I ask for a small
> self-contained testcase for the problem.

That is why I thanked the user who reported the problem. Now the
problem is known with a small self-contained testcase. Can we fix it
now? That is all I care.


H.J.

References:
- Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]