This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)
- From: jlarmour at redhat dot com (Jonathan Larmour)
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:31:46 +0100
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Newsgroups: cygnus.gdb
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
In article <3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com> you write:
>See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>
>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.
Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine