This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)

To: kingdon at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 21:33:31 -0800
Cc: donnte at microsoft dot com, gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <BB61526CDE70D2119D0F00805FBECA2F12A39A08@RED-MSG-55><20000301123337B.mitchell@codesourcery.com><bd7pe3t7t.fsf@rtl.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Kingdon <kingdon@redhat.com> writes:

    >> I think GCC shouldn't put out any line notes for the prologue
    >> in the first place.  That's what's causing the problem,
    >> indirectly.  Does GDB require a line note in the prologue, or
    >> can we wait until the first bit of real code?

    Jim> GDB expects the first line number to be for the real code
    Jim> (unless something has changed, or I'm remembering it wrong or
    Jim> something - I didn't actually play around with the test
    Jim> cases).

Good, that means that the bug is in GCC -- even before my changes.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Donn Terry
- Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Jim Kingdon

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]