This is the mail archive of the
gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: rhl9 gdb tests -- June 24 2003
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, gdb-testers at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:00:05 -0400
- Subject: Re: rhl9 gdb tests -- June 24 2003
- References: <200306301716.h5UHGh0h020483@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> Mmmm, results!
>
> The gdb.threads part looks fine.
>
> Something bad happened in gdb.base/store.exp: hundreds of ERRORs
> on almost every test run. I've never seen that.
>
> Can you look into this, or mail me the log file for
>
> native,HEAD,3.3,2.14,dwarf-2,2/gdb.log
>
I have put the file up on the web with the other stuff.
> A lot of errors with gcc HEAD -gstabs+ are from PR gcc/10055
> which has been marked "fix for 3.4". So we are waiting on gcc folks
> for that fix.
>
> We've had FAILs in gdb.trace/packetlen.exp before. If I recall
> correctly, the last time this happened, it was because gcc was
> emitting some new debug info that gdb didn't know about yet.
> I am getting FAILs in the same configurations on Red Hat Linux 8
> so it's not a rhl9 specific thing.
>
> It would really help to have gdb 5.3 results to do "compare by gdb".
> If you can't get those then eventually I will sit down with the
> non-PASS table and check each line.
>
I just started another run with 5.3.
elena
> Michael C