This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-06-23


Here are my Sunday Project results for 2001-06-23.

The merged results for all platforms contain 1 ERROR, 0 WARNINGs,
and 175 FAILs.

Native Red Hat Linux 6.0:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     0
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7544
  # of unexpected failures        132
  # of unexpected successes       26
  # of expected failures          195
  # of untested testcases         1
  # of unsupported tests          2

Native Red Hat Linux 6.1:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     0
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7544
  # of unexpected failures        132
  # of unexpected successes       26
  # of expected failures          195
  # of untested testcases         1
  # of unsupported tests          2

Native Red Hat Linux 6.2:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     0
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7606
  # of unexpected failures        143
  # of unexpected successes       27
  # of expected failures          194
  # of untested testcases         1

Native Red Hat Linux 7:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     0
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7614
  # of unexpected failures        135
  # of unexpected successes       26
  # of expected failures          195
  # of untested testcases         1

Native Solaris 2.5.1:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     1
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7669
  # of unexpected failures        112
  # of unexpected successes       27
  # of expected failures          194
  # of unresolved testcases       33
  # of untested testcases         1

Native Solaris 2.6:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     0
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7669
  # of unexpected failures        114
  # of unexpected successes       27
  # of expected failures          194
  # of unresolved testcases       32
  # of untested testcases         1

Native Solaris 2.7:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     1
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7646
  # of unexpected failures        135
  # of unexpected successes       26
  # of expected failures          195
  # of unresolved testcases       33
  # of untested testcases         1

Native Solaris 2.8:

  === gdb Summary ===
  # of ERRORs                     1
  # of WARNINGs                   0
  # of expected passes            7641
  # of unexpected failures        140
  # of unexpected successes       26
  # of expected failures          195
  # of unresolved testcases       33
  # of untested testcases         1

I ran the tests with FSF gcc cvs gcc-3_0-branch dated 2001-06-23 and FSF
gdb cvs dated 2001-06-23.  gcc 3.0 has been released, but I am still using
the branch in anticipation that it will become gcc 3.0.1.

I revised my build process this week.  Previously I built the current
sources with a Red Hat GnuPro toolchain.  Now I have built stable Gnu
tools starting from the vendor's compiler and linker, and I use the
stable Gnu tools to build the current sources.  My stable Gnu tools are:

  make 3.79.1
  binutils 2.11.2
  gcc 3.0
  flex 2.5.4a
  bison 1.28

For testing, I still use a Red Hat GnuPro version of "expect".
I tried tcl8.3.3 and expect-5.32.1, but I ran into problems:
about 50 spurious ERRORs on native Solaris.

All hosts were available this week.

I counted the ERROR and WARNING lines by hand.

All results are in Terf, http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gdb.cgi .
Note that Terf does not report ERRORs or WARNINGs.  Also, Terf has
problems with duplicate test names.

Here are the merged ERRORs categorized by test script:

    1 TOTAL
    = =====
    1 gdb.base/shlib-call.exp

  gdb.base/shlib-call.exp:
    This script produces 1 ERROR on native Solaris 2.5.1, 2.7, and 2.8.
    I have not analyzed this ERROR.

Here are the merged FAILs categorized by test script:

    175 TOTAL
    === =====
      2 gdb.base/annota1.exp
     11 gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
      4 gdb.base/completion.exp
      1 gdb.base/corefile.exp
      1 gdb.base/default.exp
      2 gdb.base/ending-run.exp
      2 gdb.base/page.exp
      2 gdb.base/return2.exp
      4 gdb.base/selftest.exp
      8 gdb.base/shlib-call.exp
      5 gdb.base/signals.exp
      3 gdb.base/so-impl-ld.exp
      6 gdb.base/step-line.exp
      2 gdb.base/structs2.exp
      2 gdb.c++/annota2.exp
     18 gdb.c++/classes.exp
      8 gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp
      1 gdb.c++/demangle.exp
      4 gdb.c++/derivation.exp
      6 gdb.c++/inherit.exp
      2 gdb.c++/local.exp
      4 gdb.c++/method.exp
      2 gdb.c++/namespace.exp
      1 gdb.c++/overload.exp
      6 gdb.c++/templates.exp
      1 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
     31 gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi-break.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi-console.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi-hack-cli.exp
      2 gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi-simplerun.exp
      6 gdb.mi/mi-stack.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp
      3 gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi0-break.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi0-hack-cli.exp
      2 gdb.mi/mi0-regs.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi0-simplerun.exp
      6 gdb.mi/mi0-stack.exp
      1 gdb.mi/mi0-var-cmd.exp
      3 gdb.mi/mi0-var-display.exp
      1 gdb.stabs/weird.exp
      2 gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
      1 gdb.trace/packetlen.exp

(Note that I now sort this list by script name rather than fail count).

The changes from 2001-06-16 are:

  2001-06-16 total         142 FAILs
  gdb.base/selftest.exp     +1 FAILs  gdb built with different compiler
  gdb.mi/*.exp             +32 FAILs  new tests; gdb mi now enabled
  2001-06-23 total         175 FAILs

gdb.base/selftest.exp:

  selftest.exp invokes gdb on the gdb executable.  Thus, this test is
  sensitive to the compiler used to build gdb.  This week I changed
  from Red Hat Gnupro compilers to gcc 3.0 compilers.  This is likely
  to account for this change.

  Note that the gdb test programs have always been built with the current
  compiler from gcc-3_0-branch, and their results have not changed.
  selftest.exp is unusual because it uses the gdb executable itself for
  a test program.

gdb.mi/*.exp:

  gdb has a new directory of MI tests, with about 1000 PASSing tests
  and 32 FAILing tests.  This is the first week for these tests.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]