This is the mail archive of the
gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-04-29
- To: gdb-testers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-04-29
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:46:55 -0700
Here are my Sunday Project results for 2001-04-29.
The merged results for all platforms contain 0 ERRORs, 0 WARNINGs,
and 108 FAILs.
Native Red Hat Linux 6.1:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6569
# of unexpected failures 99
# of unexpected successes 29
# of expected failures 165
# of untested testcases 19
# of unsupported tests 1
Native Red Hat Linux 7.0:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6644
# of unexpected failures 105
# of unexpected successes 30
# of expected failures 163
# of untested testcases 18
Native Solaris 2.5.1:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6635
# of unexpected failures 96
# of unexpected successes 30
# of expected failures 163
# of unresolved testcases 32
# of untested testcases 19
Native Solaris 2.6:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6635
# of unexpected failures 97
# of unexpected successes 30
# of expected failures 163
# of unresolved testcases 32
# of untested testcases 19
I ran the tests with FSF gcc cvs gcc-3_0-branch dated 2001-04-22 and
FSF dated 2001-04-29. I counted the ERROR and WARNING lines by hand
inspection of the summary files.
I had to keep using last week's gcc. With gcc-3_0-branch 2001-04-29, I
was unable to build a unified tree on native Solaris. The build failed in
the make stage with "configure: error: libtool tag configuration failed".
I also tried building gcc-3_0-branch 2001-04-29 by itself without merging
the src tree; I got a link error about bad options to /usr/ccs/bin/ld.
Looking at the gcc source and mailing lists, it looks like the gcc tree
is currently unstable. If the problem persists next weekend then I will
investigate more and file a PR against gcc.
I was unable to test on a native Red Hat Linux 6.2 machine this week.
I substituted a Red Hat Linux 6.1 machine, but I don't know if the
results are comparable. Next weekend I hope to test on both a 6.1
and a 6.2 machine.
All results are in Terf, http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gdb.cgi .
Note that Terf does not report ERRORs or WARNINGs. Also, Terf has
problems with duplicate test names.
Here are the merged FAILs categorized by test script:
108 TOTAL
=== =====
31 gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp
18 gdb.c++/classes.exp
8 gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp
7 gdb.c++/templates.exp
6 gdb.c++/inherit.exp
6 gdb.base/step-line.exp
4 gdb.c++/method.exp
4 gdb.c++/derivation.exp
3 gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
2 gdb.c++/namespace.exp
2 gdb.c++/local.exp
2 gdb.c++/annota2.exp
2 gdb.base/structs2.exp
2 gdb.base/selftest.exp
2 gdb.base/return2.exp
2 gdb.base/ending-run.exp
1 gdb.trace/packetlen.exp
1 gdb.stabs/weird.exp
1 gdb.java/jmisc.exp
1 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
1 gdb.c++/overload.exp
1 gdb.c++/demangle.exp
1 gdb.base/exprs.exp
Changes from 2001-04-22:
2001-04-22 total 128 FAILs
gdb.base/callfwmall.exp -11 FAILs switch from rhl 6.2 to rhl 6.1
gdb.c++/local.exp -1 FAILs test script fix
gdb.c++/namespace.exp -3 FAILs test script fix
gdb.c++/overload.exp -5 FAILs test script fix
2001-04-29 total 108 FAILs
gdb.base/callfwmall.exp had 11 FAILs on native Red Hat Linux 6.2
last week, but no FAILs on native Red Hat Linux 6.1 this week.
So there are two changes involved, 6.2 -> 6.1 and 2001-04-22 -> 2001-04-29.
Next week I hope to have both 6.1 and 6.2 machines to test one.
The improvements in local.exp, namespace.exp, and overload.exp are due to
fixes in the test scripts to avoid PR gdb/34, "g++ v3 functions show as
"inheritance2() ()"".