[Bug c++/16874] Setting a breakpoint on function in anonymous namespace is unnecessarily awkward

["markus at trippelsdorf dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16874

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #7974|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
Created attachment 8515
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8515&action=edit
updated patch

I've updated Patrick's patch for gdb trunk.

It works fine:
Example from comment0:

 % gdb ./a.out
Reading symbols from ./a.out...done.
(gdb) b fo<tab> 
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40058a: file anon_namesp.cpp, line 1.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/markus/a.out 
Breakpoint 1, (anonymous namespace)::foo () at anon_namesp.cpp:1

Example from comment8:

Reading symbols from ./a.out...done.
(gdb) b fo<tab><tab>
foo()   foo2()  
(gdb) b foo2() 
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4005b3: file t2.cpp, line 1.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/markus/a.out 
Breakpoint 1, (anonymous namespace)::foo2 () at t2.cpp:1
1       namespace { int foo2 (void) { return 1; } }

Any chance to move this issue forward?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.