This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug symtab/18686] New: better support for separate debug files
- From: "dje at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:12:30 +0000
- Subject: [Bug symtab/18686] New: better support for separate debug files
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18686
Bug ID: 18686
Summary: better support for separate debug files
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: symtab
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dje at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Every now and then I need data which gdb has but I can't get at.
An example is separate debug files.
We should have a way to list separate debug files (not as maint commands, but
as real commands, I'm asking this from a user's perspective).
I don't have a strong opinion on how, but including it with "info shared" is
one way, modulo that won't include the executable.
"info objfiles" is one thought.
Second, we should have a way to add a separate debug file after the fact.
There is add-symbol-file, but it's not the same, *and* it requires a load
address. Bleah, as a user I don't want to have to compute the load address, and
some users get confused about what address to provide.
We should have a way to say "use this file as a separate debug file for this
objfile" (and a way to remove it too).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.