This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug record/18059] Why can't "record instruction-history" and "record function-call-history" work with "record full"?
- From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:18:24 +0000
- Subject: [Bug record/18059] Why can't "record instruction-history" and "record function-call-history" work with "record full"?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-18059-4717 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18059
Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
How can we tell if we don't know your mental model? :-)
I think those are only implemented in the record-btrace target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.