This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug python/17529] Need to better specify contract between MI and pretty-printers
- From: "keiths at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:51:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug python/17529] Need to better specify contract between MI and pretty-printers
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-17529-4717 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17529
Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |keiths at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com> ---
What's worse is that varobj needs to know the children for any given variable,
but when the parent has a pretty-printer associated with it, it is currently
impossible for the code to compute how many children there are.
This leads to an assertion failure in varobj.c. See varobj/15166.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.