This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gdb/13356] Be less strict about C++ overloading when callingfunctions from the inferior


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13356

rguenther at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P1
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com

--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-15 11:58:38 UTC ---
PING.  Now that GCC builds with a C++ compiler this starts to be _very_ _very_
annoying!

(gdb) call debug_tree (*expr_p)
 <integer_cst 0x7ffff695d7c0 type <integer_type 0x7ffff67fa5e8 int> constant 9>
(gdb) call debug_tree (0x7ffff67fa5e8)
Cannot resolve function debug_tree to any overloaded instance

bah!

(gdb) call debug_tree ((tree)0x7ffff67fa5e8)
 <integer_type 0x7ffff67fa5e8 int public SI
    size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6800100 type <integer_type 0x7ffff67fa0a8
bitsizetype> constant 32>
    unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6800120 type <integer_type 0x7ffff67fa000
sizetype> constant 4>
    align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff67fa5e8 precision 32
min <integer_cst 0x7ffff68000a0 -2147483648> max <integer_cst 0x7ffff68000c0
2147483647>
    pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff68082a0>>

PLASE!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]