This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug c++/14160] function field's "physname" is wrong
- From: "tromey at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:00:11 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/14160] function field's "physname" is wrong
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-14160-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14160
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-05-24 16:00:11 UTC ---
Fixing this and some other physname fallout would be good.
However, I wonder if there is a better way in this case.
Like, can we make "is constructor" an attribute on the function field,
and not resort to checking the mangled name?
cp-abi.h says this would be cleaner; not sure why it wasn't done this
way in the first place.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.