This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug ada/11385] cannot catch Ada exceptions
- From: "fw at deneb dot enyo.de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:46:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/11385] cannot catch Ada exceptions
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-11385-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11385
fw at deneb dot enyo.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fw at deneb dot enyo.de
--- Comment #5 from fw at deneb dot enyo.de 2012-01-30 06:46:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can we alter the check in ada-lang.c to use lookup_minimal_symbol()? What makes
> it a minimal symbol when compiled by Ada (s-except.adb) rather than C (my hi.c,
> in Comment 2)?
I think minimal symbols are symbols which do not come from debugging
information. Does Ada support work even if the run-time library is dynamically
linked and compiled without debugging information? Then using the minimal
symbol seems okay. Otherwise, GDB should just print a better error message,
and the fix is not to strip the Ada run-time libraries.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.