This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:16:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12528-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12528
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-16 18:16:35 UTC ---
CVSROOT: /cvs/src
Module name: src
Changes by: ppluzhnikov@sourceware.org 2011-03-16 18:16:26
Modified files:
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base: Makefile.in
Log message:
ChangeLog:
2011-03-16 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
PR gdb/12528
* dwarf2read.c (noop_record_line): New function.
(dwarf_decode_lines): Ignore line tables for GCd functions.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2011-03-16 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
PR gdb/12528
* gdb.base/Makefile.in: Adjust EXECUTABLES.
* gdb.base/break-on-linker-gcd-function.exp: New test.
* gdb.base/break-on-linker-gcd-function.cc: New file.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.