This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/1936: Wrong address of struct member


The following reply was made to PR c++/1936; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: c_keil@yahoo.de
Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: c++/1936: Wrong address of struct member
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 10:54:51 -0400

 On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:26:43PM -0000, c_keil@yahoo.de wrote:
 > 
 > >Number:         1936
 > >Category:       c++
 > >Synopsis:       Wrong address of struct member
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       serious
 > >Priority:       medium
 > >Responsible:    unassigned
 > >State:          open
 > >Class:          sw-bug
 > >Submitter-Id:   net
 > >Arrival-Date:   Tue May 03 14:28:03 UTC 2005
 > >Closed-Date:
 > >Last-Modified:
 > >Originator:     c_keil@yahoo.de
 > >Release:        gdb-6.3
 > >Organization:
 > >Environment:
 > SuSE Linux 9.0
 > output of uname -a:
 > Linux xxx 2.4.21-286-smp4G #1 SMP Sat Apr 2 09:08:57 UTC 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
 > >Description:
 > Gdb seems to judge the size of the bool type different from gcc (which should presumably be the reference, as the program is running fine on its own).
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 > Compile the program with -g (I was using g++-3.3.1 from SuSE Linux). Open program in debugger and set breakpoint after printf line. Run and compare the output with 
 > "p &t.d".
 
 This was a bug in GCC 3.3.x.  It produces:
 
  <1><372e>: Abbrev Number: 20 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
      DW_AT_sibling     : <37a1> 
      DW_AT_name        : st     
      DW_AT_byte_size   : 12     
      DW_AT_decl_file   : 1      
      DW_AT_decl_line   : 4      
  <2><3739>: Abbrev Number: 21 (DW_TAG_member)
      DW_AT_name        : b      
      DW_AT_decl_file   : 1      
      DW_AT_decl_line   : 5      
      DW_AT_type        : <37a1> 
      DW_AT_data_member_location: 2 byte block: 23 0 (DW_OP_plus_uconst: 0)
  <2><3745>: Abbrev Number: 21 (DW_TAG_member)
      DW_AT_name        : d      
      DW_AT_decl_file   : 1      
      DW_AT_decl_line   : 6      
      DW_AT_type        : <37a9> 
      DW_AT_data_member_location: 2 byte block: 23 8 (DW_OP_plus_uconst: 8)
 
 That says the double is padded to +8 in the structure, but the program
 shows it is only padded to +4.
 
 If I compile using g++ 3.4, I get the right result.
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz
 CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]