This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cli/1608: "edit" command doesn't put '/' between path and file


The following reply was made to PR cli/1608; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc: xinsolo@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: cli/1608: "edit" command doesn't put '/' between path and file
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:57:15 -0400 (EDT)

 Also reported by xinsolo@hotmail.com .
 
 I whipped up a matrix and tried it out.
 
 This problem always happened with dwarf-2 and never happened with stabs+.
 The original code was added to gdb on 2002-09-20 so it's quite likely
 that the original author tested it only with stabs+.
 
 For future reference, here's how I tested it.
 
   .gdbinit says:
     break main
     run
     edit
     quit
 
 Then I do:
 
   export EDITOR=echo
   for gccversion in 2.95.3 3.3.4 3.4.1 ; do
     for gformat in dwarf-2 stabs+ ; do
       for language in c c++ ; do
 	compile $program in $language with $gccversion and debug format $gformat
 	gdb $program
       done
     done
   done
 
 All the stabs+ "edit" commands look like this:
 
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-cc.cc
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-cc.cc
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edit/hello-cc.cc
 
 All the dwarf-2 "edit" commands look like this:
 
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-c.c
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-cc.cc
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-cc.cc
   +6 /berman/home/mec.gnu/gdb/edithello-cc.cc
 
 The "+6" is a line number, the first argument to the editor.
 
 Looking at the source, edit_command has its own little bit of machinery
 to concatenate the dirname and filename.  I think it should be sharing
 some machinery with list_command, like bits of openp or xfullpath or
 gdb_realpath, not doing its own concatenation.  That way it's more
 likely to work on non-POSIX file systems too.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]