This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
pending/1521: target_op(..) -> target_op(target, ...) obvious
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:13:35 -0400
- Subject: pending/1521: target_op(..) -> target_op(target, ...) obvious
>Number: 1521
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: target_op(..) -> target_op(target, ...) obvious
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 19 20:08:00 UTC 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:
>Release:
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
As part of the on-going OO of GDB, the "target vector" is one of the
next things up for treatment. I'd like to be sure that everyones ok
with the mechanical transformatioin:
target_OP (...) -> taget_OP (target, ...)
being considered "fairly obvious" (post patch, give it a few days,
commit patch). Pushing the target around is going to involve touching
files across maintenance boundraries.
thoughts?
Andrew
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: