This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: c++/892: gcc 3.2, linux 2.4 using GDB 5.3
- From: "mensoeng" <ptwahyu at centrin dot net dot id>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 24 Mar 2003 03:18:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/892: gcc 3.2, linux 2.4 using GDB 5.3
- Reply-to: "mensoeng" <ptwahyu at centrin dot net dot id>
The following reply was made to PR c++/892; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "mensoeng" <ptwahyu at centrin dot net dot id>
To: <gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/892: gcc 3.2, linux 2.4 using GDB 5.3
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:02:00 +0700
I also encounter similar problem.
From my observation, the problem appear if I set the breakpoint by
source_filename:line_number.
But if I set it using symbol name e.g: main() or what_ever_function() it
works correctly.
I also saw that setting breakpoint using source_file:line_number end up with
incorrect break address.