This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 3 Mar 2003 19:58:00 -0000
- Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/1069; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc:
Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:54:02 -0500
----- Forwarded message from Monte Becker <monte at juniper dot net> -----
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:09:56 -0500
From: "Monte Becker" <monte at juniper dot net>
Subject: RE: c++/1069: Issues printing derived objects with gdb
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at mvista dot com>
Daniel,
I deleted all break points, and then tried again. I think I
described the problem incorrectly. It appears that
1) The print is ignored (no output)
2) Program execution resumes (as if cont command used)
Before, I had a break point at a spot that was called frequently.
I believe that before I deleted the break points, 1) and 2) occurred,
but then the program stopped at the same break point. (Does that make
since? I can try to be more clear if needed.)
In any case, I'll create a test case for you,
Monte
> > There are no breaks inside of this object.
>
> Are you sure? Do you have a break at filebuf::filebuf, and what's the
> backtrace look like when GDB claims you've hit it?
>
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> >
> > (Will construct test case if needed. Let me know.)
>
> It always helps if you can do this.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer