This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

c++/945: GDB can't demangle random Lucid stuff


>Number:         945
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       GDB can't demangle random Lucid stuff
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jan 17 12:18:00 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     carlton@math.stanford.edu
>Release:        GNU gdb 2002-10-11-cvs
>Organization:
>Environment:
any
>Description:
The testsuite (gdb.c++/demangle.exp) alleges that
__vtbl__3foo__vt_cc_main_
is a legitimate mangled variable name under the Lucid style.
The testsuite, however, has no idea what the correct
demangling is.  GDB can't demangle this.

I file this PR only so that I can KFAIL the test in
question: I will then suspend the PR, given that Lucid
demangling should be obsolete and that we don't really
know if the string in question really is a legitimate
mangled name (so it might not be a bug after all).
>How-To-Repeat:
(gdb) set demangle-style lucid
(gdb) maint demangle __vtbl__3foo__vt_cc_main_
Can't demangle "__vtbl__3foo__vt_cc_main_"
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]