This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
gdb/791: should HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT be in target vector?
- From: markom at opencores dot org
- To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com
- Date: 9 Oct 2002 11:56:37 -0000
- Subject: gdb/791: should HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT be in target vector?
- Reply-to: markom at opencores dot org
>Number: 791
>Category: gdb
>Synopsis: should HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT be in target vector?
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Oct 09 04:58:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: markom@opencores.org
>Release: current
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
> >> > #define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
> >
> > What about this?
>
> Um, that will need thinking about (add to architecture or target vector)?
>
> Sigh, for the moment, add it (separate patch) as a variable to the
> architecture vector and then create a bug report noteing that it needs a
> re-think.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: