This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb
- From: Juergen dot Lindemeyer at t-online dot de (Juergen Lindemeyer)
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 26 Sep 2002 19:08:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb
- Reply-to: Juergen dot Lindemeyer at t-online dot de (Juergen Lindemeyer)
The following reply was made to PR gdb/59; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen.Lindemeyer@t-online.de (Juergen Lindemeyer)
To: nobody@sources.redhat.com, jdboyer@mediatrix.com,
gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:01:30 +0200
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=59
Hi everybody,
I don't know, who will receive this eMail (because I am unfamilar with
this bug-tracking-system ...) so please be patient with me.
It seams, that I have the same error (as gdb/59) on my box. I have the
error with version 5.0 and version 5.2.1 (downloaded today). I also have
seen the error-report gdb/709 that seams to be similar. I am very much
interested in a fix for this problem. I also would like to know, if the
other error is the same. I tried to patch my 5.2.1 with the given fix
for 709, but that didn't change a thing (maybe this was a little dirty
... but I tried).
Does anybody know, how I can reach "drow" who seams to be fixing 709.
This problem is really very nasty and makes debugging very difficult for
me.
Best regards,
/juergen
--
.... . juergen.lindemeyer@gmx.de = = =
. . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. . uergen . indemeyer heute ist Mittwoch, heute
. .... kann alles passieren ...