This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Make gdbserver work with filename-only binaries


On Wednesday, February 28 2018, Simon Marchi wrote:

> On 2018-02-27 10:27 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/abspath.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/abspath.exp
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..beb1d96209
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/abspath.exp
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
>> +
>> +# Copyright 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> +
>> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
>> +# (at your option) any later version.
>> +#
>> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +#
>> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> +# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> +
>> +# Test that gdbserver performs path expansion/adjustment when we
>> +# provide just a filename (without any path specifications) to it.
>> +
>> +load_lib gdbserver-support.exp
>> +
>> +standard_testfile normal.c
>> +
>> +if { [skip_gdbserver_tests] } {
>> +    return 0
>> +}
>> +
>> +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile debug] } {
>> +    return -1
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Make sure we're disconnected, in case we're testing with an
>> +# extended-remote board, therefore already connected.
>> +gdb_test "disconnect" ".*"
>> +
>> +set target_exec [gdbserver_download_current_prog]
>> +
>> +# Switch to where $target_exec lives, and execute gdbserver from
>> +# there.
>> +with_cwd "[file dirname $target_exec]" {
>> +    set target_execname [file tail $target_exec]
>> +    set res [gdbserver_start "" $target_execname]
>> +
>> +    set gdbserver_protocol [lindex $res 0]
>> +    set gdbserver_gdbport [lindex $res 1]
>> +    gdb_target_cmd $gdbserver_protocol $gdbserver_gdbport
>> +
>> +    gdb_breakpoint main
>> +    gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint $decimal.* main.*" "continue to main"
>> +}
>
> The patch LGTM, just a note about the test.
>
> I think this won't work when testing with a remote target (wher gdbserver
> is started on another machine.  with_cwd will try to cd into an directory
> that exists on the other machine, or an "empty string" directory (I am not sure
> what gdbserver_download_current_prog returns), so it will probably crash.
>
> It would complicate the test quite a bit to make it work with a remote
> target, and wouldn't add much value: when testing with a remote target,
> gdbserver is started with a filename-only argument (that's how I
> stumbled on the issue).  So if that breaks, all the other tests will fail.
>
> A counter argument for that would be that the remote board file is subject
> to change. if we change it so that it invokes gdbserver by passing
> non-filename-only paths, the feature would not be tested anymore...
>
> At the minimum, I think we need to skip this test is target is a remote
> one ([is_remote target]).  If you want to go further and make the test
> work with a remote target, then go ahead, but I would be fine with
> just skipping it.

Thanks, Simon.  I'll skip the test for remote targets for now.  I'll
push it afterwards.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]