This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Always print "Detaching after fork from child..."


On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:47:14 +0100, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235197

As a justification for this patch:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cat >fork2.c <<EOH
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
static void printit(void) {
  puts("printed");
}
int main(void) {
  if (!fork()) printit();
  return 0;
}
EOH
gcc -o fork2 fork2.c -Wall -g
gdb -q ./fork2
(gdb) b printit
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40052b: file fork2.c, line 4.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /quad/home/jkratoch/t/fork2 
printed
[Inferior 1 (process 15812) exited normally]
(gdb) q
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the GDB user does not expect the program could do any forks s/he is
confused the breakpoint did not get hit and assumes GDB is just broken.

But then I cannot say this patch is too great, it produces many uninteresting 
	Detaching after fork from child process 24905.
messages rather just annoying in most cases.  So nowadays I feel the message
is more an excuse how to show it is user's fault s/he did not read it.
But I think nobody reads them as there are too many such messages.

I believe the right fix would be to make "set detach-on-fork off" the default.
But that is sure a new can of worms I do not want to speculate about.


Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]