This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with writing Linux core PRSTATUS note on MIPS o32, n32 and n64 into core file
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at mips dot com>
- To: Djordje Todorovic <djordje dot todorovic at rt-rk dot com>, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "nemanja dot popov at rt-rk dot com" <nemanja dot popov at rt-rk dot com>, <petar dot jovanovic at rt-rk dot com>, "Ananthakrishna Sowda (asowda)" <asowda at cisco dot com>, Nikola Prica <nikola dot prica at rt-rk dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:58:04 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with writing Linux core PRSTATUS note on MIPS o32, n32 and n64 into core file
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <74618d56-fa31-4cfe-329f-6a9078bac92b@rt-rk.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1710171449200.3886@tp.orcam.me.uk> <724f0bc9-6744-a915-d19d-77db7e9ce514@rt-rk.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1710252126220.3886@tp.orcam.me.uk> <64ad38a4-b8ae-912e-45d6-7048135ada2e@rt-rk.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1710301253210.3886@tp.orcam.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1710301403000.3886@tp.orcam.me.uk> <8475f0b7-969d-3c27-27f2-a4944e58e954@rt-rk.com>
Hi Djordje,
> >Can you please use the time to enter the bug report, and
> >can you also tell me if your copyright assignment has been sorted out with
> >FSF?
>
> The bug report is created and it can be found on the following link:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22381
Thank you, I have updated it with some pointers, based on your earlier
reference.
> Also, the copyright assignment with FSF has been sorted out.
Great!
> > if {![string match $host_triplet $target_triplet]} {
> > setup_kfail "gdb/..." "*-*-*"
> > }
> >
> >really (`isnative' doesn't help here as it's too restrictive: we could
> >have a native GDB built on a different system; this is actually what I use
> >as I don't currently have an adequate version of native MIPS GCC set up).
>
> I agree with you that this is more appropriate way to do it.
>
> So, could you please, tell me do you want from me to resubmit the whole patch series
> or just the last one?
I think there is no point in resending, as long as Pedro is fine with
and approves your most recent version of the test case patch posted (NB
it helps if on resubmission you number patch revisions in the subject
line like [PATCH v3 2/3]). Pedro?
Once we've got the final ack from Pedro, I'll proceed with the right
steps to push your changes, with the tweaks noted in the final review
round applied. I'll post the actual patches committed, for posterity.
Maciej