This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call
On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common
>> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what
>> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly
>> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason.
>> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead.
>
> Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;)
No need. Go here:
http://austingroupbugs.net/
> I am cc-ing musl-libc list now.
Original thread here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00426.html
Thanks,
Pedro Alves