This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 8.0 release/branching 2017-03-20 update
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Nitish Kumar Mishra <mishra dot nitish dot 88 at gmail dot com>, Tremblay <antoine dot tremblay at ericsson dot com>, Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>, "Wiederhake, Tim" <tim dot wiederhake at intel dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:27:56 -0700
- Subject: Re: GDB 8.0 release/branching 2017-03-20 update
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170320201629.pbjzaqsnvs7dx7f2@adacore.com> <CAH=s-PP5HtpcGxGVBQ7eYaO_reV=GggZ6eVv5Nhs8kChNJHVLQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170320225240.mlb6no7eyxibyomr@adacore.com> <CAH=s-PO1m6fx3Sw1Vm1X9BU0pJ5FpYmUAh+LJruQa1ts-G0vqA@mail.gmail.com>
> > Since they are new, and we're still deep in the design phase,
> > I think it is more reasonable to branch without them. The worse
>
> What do you mean by "branch without them"? These patches
> were reviewed and committed on Feb. I didn't have a chance
> reading the patches, until recently I want to use these python
> APIs to measure the performance/speed of reverse debugging.
I misunderstood when you said they were new, and thought
nothing had been checked in yet. But I see that you're now
proposing we temporary back them out, which I agree is probably
the best compromise, at this point.
--
Joel