This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [pushed] Fix PR tui/21216: TUI line breaks regression


On 03/10/2017 06:46 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

>>> and you were right, there are other debuggers which
>>> already do it the right way.
>>
>> I don't think I ever said such a thing.
> 
> You said something different although IMO with the same practical result.

That's an incorrect interpretation.

> This text from an internal list but I do not find that too secret:
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:44:11 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> # Basically you're saying we should rewrite the whole CLI from scratch.
> # And it basically seems like writing a _different_ debugger from
> # scratch to me.

That I did say, but that "different" meant that it'd be a different 
debugger in the user's perspective and in the use cases that it
could support.  E.g., how with separate components in separate processes
you can't have an single integrated Python API.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]